The Women's War Games match at Survivor Series sparked some heated debates, both in the arena and online. While the match itself had standout moments, Nia Jax became the center of attention—unfortunately, for all the wrong reasons. Criticism of her chair shots and overall performance flooded Twitter, and while some comments were constructive, others veered into toxic territory.
As Bully Ray highlighted on Busted Open, there’s an art to every move in wrestling, whether it’s swinging a chair or executing a technical takedown. Nia, a veteran in her own right, faced challenges not entirely in her control, such as the need for her opponent to create openings during key spots. However, the match also suffered from a lack of storytelling—fans and even casual observers were left asking, “Why are they fighting?”
While War Games brought chaos and excitement, it exposed the need for stronger narratives in multi-person matches. The pacing felt off at times, and without a compelling backstory, even the most impressive spots failed to resonate. That said, there’s room for growth, and we hope WWE continues to refine these high-stakes encounters.
For a full breakdown of the Women’s War Games match, Nia Jax’s performance, and why storytelling is key, catch this week’s episode of the WrestleChat Podcast on YouTube or iHeartRadio. Let’s dive deeper into what worked—and what didn’t—together.
コメント